# Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

(→Threads and further problems) |
|||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

== The Problem == | == The Problem == | ||

− | Initially, the basic problem to be considered by the Polymath1 project was to explore a particular [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/a-combinatorial-approach-to-density-hales-jewett/ combinatorial approach] to the [[density Hales-Jewett theorem]] for k=3 (DHJ(3)), suggested by Tim Gowers. The [[Furstenberg-Katznelson argument|original proof of DHJ(3) used arguments from ergodic theory]]. Fairly soon, the scope of the project expanded and | + | Initially, the basic problem to be considered by the Polymath1 project was to explore a particular [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/02/01/a-combinatorial-approach-to-density-hales-jewett/ combinatorial approach] to the [[density Hales-Jewett theorem]] for k=3 (DHJ(3)), suggested by Tim Gowers. The [[Furstenberg-Katznelson argument|original proof of DHJ(3) used arguments from ergodic theory]]. Fairly soon, the scope of the project expanded and forked. Two projects emerged. The first project, "New Proof", had as its aim that of discovering any combinatorial argument for the theorem. The second project, "Low Dimensions", aimed to calculate precise bounds on density Hales-Jewett numbers and [[Moser's cube problem|Moser numbers]] for low dimensions n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc. Both projects appear to have been successful, and are in the writing-up stage. |

+ | |||

+ | ==Write-up repositories== | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[TeX files for first paper|Write-up page for the "New Proof" project]]. The most recent draft is [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~odonnell/dhj.pdf here], tentatively titled "A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem". | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[outline of second paper|Write-up page for the "Low Dimensions" project]]. The most recent draft is [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/polymath2.pdf perhaps here], tentatively titled "Density Hales-Jewett and Moser numbers in low dimensions". | ||

+ | |||

==Basic definitions== | ==Basic definitions== | ||

Line 38: | Line 45: | ||

* (1000-1049) [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/problem-solved-probably/ Problem solved (probably)] (inactive) | * (1000-1049) [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/problem-solved-probably/ Problem solved (probably)] (inactive) | ||

* [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/polymath1-and-open-collaborative-mathematics/ Polymath1 and open collaborative mathematics] (inactive) | * [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/polymath1-and-open-collaborative-mathematics/ Polymath1 and open collaborative mathematics] (inactive) | ||

− | * (1050-1099) [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/dhj3-and-related-results-1050-1099/ DHJ(3) and related results: 1050-1099] ('''active''') | + | * (1050-1099) [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/dhj3-and-related-results-1050-1099/ DHJ(3) and related results: 1050-1099] ('''barely active''') |

* (1100-1199) [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/dhj3-1100-1199-density-hales-jewett-type-numbers/ DHJ(3): 1100-1199 (Density Hales-Jewett type numbers)] (inactive) | * (1100-1199) [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/dhj3-1100-1199-density-hales-jewett-type-numbers/ DHJ(3): 1100-1199 (Density Hales-Jewett type numbers)] (inactive) | ||

*(discussion) [http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/an-open-discussion-and-polls-around-roths-theorem/ An Open Discussion and Polls: Around Roth’s Theorem] (inactive) | *(discussion) [http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2009/03/25/an-open-discussion-and-polls-around-roths-theorem/ An Open Discussion and Polls: Around Roth’s Theorem] (inactive) | ||

Line 45: | Line 52: | ||

* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/dhj-still-writing-the-second-paper/ DHJ: still writing the second paper] ('''active''') | * [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/06/14/dhj-still-writing-the-second-paper/ DHJ: still writing the second paper] ('''active''') | ||

− | [http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=polymath1&btnG=Search+Blogs Here is a further list of blog posts related to the Polymath1 project]. [http://en.wordpress.com/tag/polymath1/ Here is wordpress's list] | + | [http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=polymath1&btnG=Search+Blogs Here is a further list of blog posts related to the Polymath1 project]. [http://en.wordpress.com/tag/polymath1/ Here is wordpress's list]. |

A spreadsheet containing the latest upper and lower bounds for <math>c_n</math> can be found [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=p5T0SktZY9DsU-uZ1tK7VEg here]. Here are the proofs of our [[upper and lower bounds]] for these constants, as well as the [[higher-dimensional DHJ numbers|counterparts for higher k]]. | A spreadsheet containing the latest upper and lower bounds for <math>c_n</math> can be found [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=p5T0SktZY9DsU-uZ1tK7VEg here]. Here are the proofs of our [[upper and lower bounds]] for these constants, as well as the [[higher-dimensional DHJ numbers|counterparts for higher k]]. | ||

Line 56: | Line 63: | ||

Here is a [[tidy problem page]]. | Here is a [[tidy problem page]]. | ||

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

− | |||

== Proof strategies == | == Proof strategies == | ||

Line 122: | Line 122: | ||

*[[Austin's proof]] (very sketchy) | *[[Austin's proof]] (very sketchy) | ||

*[[Austin's proof II]] (mostly complete, though more explanation and motivation needed) | *[[Austin's proof II]] (mostly complete, though more explanation and motivation needed) | ||

+ | *A [[timeline]] of some of the progress on the "New Proof" project. | ||

==Generalizing to DHJ(k)== | ==Generalizing to DHJ(k)== | ||

Line 136: | Line 137: | ||

There are a number of ways that even casual participants can help contribute to the Polymath1 project: | There are a number of ways that even casual participants can help contribute to the Polymath1 project: | ||

− | |||

* Expand the [[bibliography]] | * Expand the [[bibliography]] | ||

Line 147: | Line 147: | ||

* Jump in to the technical discussion; find some nice new angles to the discussed problems. | * Jump in to the technical discussion; find some nice new angles to the discussed problems. | ||

* Add to this list | * Add to this list | ||

+ | |||

+ | == End notes == | ||

+ | |||

+ | [["New Proof" grant acknowledgments]] | ||

+ | |||

+ | [["Low Dimensions" grant acknowledgments]] |

## Revision as of 02:09, 23 June 2009

## Contents

- 1 The Problem
- 2 Write-up repositories
- 3 Basic definitions
- 4 Useful background materials
- 5 Threads and further problems
- 6 Proof strategies
- 7 Related theorems
- 8 Important concepts related to possible proofs
- 9 Complete proofs or detailed sketches of potentially useful results
- 10 Attempts at proofs of DHJ(3)
- 11 Generalizing to DHJ(k)
- 12 Bibliography
- 13 How to help out
- 14 End notes

## The Problem

Initially, the basic problem to be considered by the Polymath1 project was to explore a particular combinatorial approach to the density Hales-Jewett theorem for k=3 (DHJ(3)), suggested by Tim Gowers. The original proof of DHJ(3) used arguments from ergodic theory. Fairly soon, the scope of the project expanded and forked. Two projects emerged. The first project, "New Proof", had as its aim that of discovering any combinatorial argument for the theorem. The second project, "Low Dimensions", aimed to calculate precise bounds on density Hales-Jewett numbers and Moser numbers for low dimensions n = 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc. Both projects appear to have been successful, and are in the writing-up stage.

## Write-up repositories

Write-up page for the "New Proof" project. The most recent draft is here, tentatively titled "A new proof of the density Hales-Jewett theorem".

Write-up page for the "Low Dimensions" project. The most recent draft is perhaps here, tentatively titled "Density Hales-Jewett and Moser numbers in low dimensions".

## Basic definitions

## Useful background materials

Here is some background to the project. There is also a general discussion on massively collaborative "polymath" projects. This is a cheatsheet for editing the wiki. Here is a python script which can help convert sizeable chunks of LaTeX into wiki-tex. Finally, here is the general Wiki user's guide.

## Threads and further problems

- Is massively collaborative mathematics possible? (inactive)
- (1-199) A combinatorial approach to density Hales-Jewett (inactive)
- (200-299) Upper and lower bounds for the density Hales-Jewett problem (inactive)
- (300-399) The triangle-removal approach (inactive)
- (400-499) Quasirandomness and obstructions to uniformity (inactive)
- (500-599) Possible proof strategies (inactive)
- (600-699) A reading seminar on density Hales-Jewett (inactive)
- (700-799) Bounds for the first few density Hales-Jewett numbers, and related quantities (inactive)
- (800-849) Brief review of polymath1 (inactive)
- (850-899) DHJ(3): 851-899 (inactive)
- (900-999) DHJ(3): 900-999 (Density Hales-Jewett type numbers) (inactive)
- (1000-1049) Problem solved (probably) (inactive)
- Polymath1 and open collaborative mathematics (inactive)
- (1050-1099) DHJ(3) and related results: 1050-1099 (
**barely active**) - (1100-1199) DHJ(3): 1100-1199 (Density Hales-Jewett type numbers) (inactive)
- (discussion) An Open Discussion and Polls: Around Roth’s Theorem (inactive)
- (1200-1299) DHJ(k): 1200-1299 (Density Hales-Jewett type numbers) (inactive)
- DHJ: writing the second paper (inactive)
- DHJ: still writing the second paper (
**active**)

Here is a further list of blog posts related to the Polymath1 project. Here is wordpress's list.

A spreadsheet containing the latest upper and lower bounds for [math]c_n[/math] can be found here. Here are the proofs of our upper and lower bounds for these constants, as well as the counterparts for higher k.

We are also collecting bounds for Fujimura's problem, motivated by a hyper-optimistic conjecture. We are additionally investigating higher-dimensional Fujimura.

There is also a chance that we will be able to improve the known bounds on Moser's cube problem or the Kakeya problem.

Here are some unsolved problems arising from the above threads.

Here is a tidy problem page.

## Proof strategies

It is natural to look for strategies based on one of the following:

- Szemerédi's original proof of Szemerédi's theorem.
- Szemerédi's combinatorial proof of Roth's theorem.
- Ajtai-Szemerédi's proof of the corners theorem.
- The density increment method.
- The triangle removal lemma.
- Ergodic-inspired methods.
- The Furstenberg-Katznelson argument.
- Use of equal-slices measure.

## Related theorems

- Carlson's theorem.
- The Carlson-Simpson theorem.
- Folkman's theorem.
- The Graham-Rothschild theorem.
- The colouring Hales-Jewett theorem.
- The Kruskal-Katona theorem.
- Roth's theorem.
- The IP-Szemerédi theorem.
- Sperner's theorem.
- Szemerédi's regularity lemma.
- Szemerédi's theorem.
- The triangle removal lemma.

All these theorems are worth knowing. The most immediately relevant are Roth's theorem, Sperner's theorem, Szemerédi's regularity lemma and the triangle removal lemma, but some of the others could well come into play as well.

- Complexity of a set
- Concentration of measure
- Influence of variables
- Obstructions to uniformity
- Quasirandomness

## Complete proofs or detailed sketches of potentially useful results

- The multidimensional Sperner theorem
- Line-free sets correlate locally with complexity-1 sets
- Correlation with a 1-set implies correlation with a subspace (Superseded)
- A Fourier-analytic proof of Sperner's theorem
- A second Fourier decomposition related to Sperner's theorem
- A Hilbert space lemma
- A Modification of the Ajtai-Szemerédi argument
- An abstract regularity lemma
- A general result about density increments

## Attempts at proofs of DHJ(3)

- An outline of a density-increment argument (ultimately didn't work)
- A second outline of a density-increment argument (seems to be OK but more checking needed)
- Another outline of the whole argument (attempts to be more detailed)
- Furstenberg-Katznelson argument (very sketchy)
- Austin's proof (very sketchy)
- Austin's proof II (mostly complete, though more explanation and motivation needed)
- A timeline of some of the progress on the "New Proof" project.

## Generalizing to DHJ(k)

- DHJ(k) implies multidimensional DHJ(k)
- Line free sets correlate locally with dense sets of complexity k-2
- A general partitioning principle

## Bibliography

Here is a Bibliography of relevant papers in the field.

## How to help out

There are a number of ways that even casual participants can help contribute to the Polymath1 project:

- Expand the bibliography
- Join the metadiscussion thread
- Join the open discussion thread (about these mathematical problems; not about the open collaboration), and participate in the polls.
- Add some more Ramsey theorems to this wiki; one could hope to flesh out this wiki into a Ramsey theory resource at some point.
- Suggest a logo for this wiki!
- Suggest a way to speed up our genetic algorithm
- Point out places where the exposition could be improved
- Jump in to the technical discussion; find some nice new angles to the discussed problems.
- Add to this list