The phrase in question is a controversial and potentially offensive internet meme and search term. It gained traction through online communities and image boards, often used in conjunction with photographs purportedly depicting overweight women in Walmart stores. The term is inherently judgmental, focusing on physical appearance and socioeconomic status.
The emergence and spread of this phrase reflect a broader societal issue regarding body image, online shaming, and class prejudice. The use of Walmart as a specific location further highlights socioeconomic disparities and stereotypes associated with the retail chain. The historical context involves the rise of internet memes and the ease with which offensive content can be disseminated online, often amplified by anonymity and echo chambers.
Due to the term’s potential for harm and offensiveness, this article will refrain from its repeated use. Instead, it will explore the underlying issues of body image, online harassment, and socioeconomic stereotyping that the phrase represents, focusing on the broader implications of such language and imagery in contemporary society.
1. Body Image Scrutiny
Body image scrutiny, defined as the critical evaluation of one’s own physical appearance or the physical appearance of others, is a core component of the phenomenon associated with the phrase “fat women of walmart.” This scrutiny manifests as a harsh and often demeaning judgment, frequently amplified by online platforms and social media. It is not merely observation, but rather a targeted assessment with negative connotations.
-
Societal Standards of Beauty
Societal standards of beauty, often unrealistic and narrowly defined, create a framework against which individuals are measured and found wanting. The phrase in question exploits these standards, using them as a weapon to ridicule individuals who deviate from the prescribed ideal. The media, advertising, and entertainment industries contribute to the perpetuation of these ideals, setting unattainable benchmarks for physical appearance. This leads to increased self-consciousness and vulnerability to external judgment.
-
Objectification and Dehumanization
The focus on physical appearance, particularly in the context of the aforementioned phrase, results in objectification and dehumanization. Individuals are reduced to their physical attributes, stripped of their individuality and treated as mere objects of ridicule. This dehumanization makes it easier for perpetrators to engage in online harassment and shaming, as they fail to recognize the humanity of their targets. The consequences can be severe, leading to emotional distress, anxiety, and depression.
-
Public Shaming and Humiliation
The internet provides a platform for public shaming and humiliation, where images and commentary can be widely disseminated and amplified. The phrase “fat women of walmart” often accompanies images taken without consent, subjecting individuals to ridicule on a global scale. This public shaming can have devastating consequences for the individuals involved, impacting their social relationships, professional opportunities, and overall well-being. The anonymity afforded by the internet often emboldens perpetrators, further exacerbating the problem.
-
Internalization of Negative Messages
Constant exposure to negative messages and criticism regarding body image can lead to the internalization of these beliefs. Individuals may begin to internalize the negative judgments directed at them, developing a distorted self-perception and experiencing feelings of self-loathing. This internalization can contribute to a cycle of negative self-talk and self-destructive behaviors. The long-term psychological impact of such experiences can be profound and require professional intervention.
In conclusion, body image scrutiny, as exemplified by the derogatory phrase and its associated online activities, highlights the pervasive influence of societal beauty standards, the dangers of objectification, and the detrimental impact of public shaming. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach, including promoting body positivity, challenging unrealistic beauty ideals, and holding perpetrators of online harassment accountable.
2. Online harassment target
The term “fat women of walmart” inherently positions individuals as targets of online harassment. The phrase’s pejorative nature and association with publicly available photographs create a scenario where these individuals are subjected to ridicule, judgment, and abusive commentary. The anonymity afforded by the internet exacerbates this vulnerability, enabling harassment without accountability.
-
Anonymity and Deindividuation
Anonymity online fosters deindividuation, a psychological state where individuals lose their sense of personal identity and responsibility. This can lead to a reduced inhibition against engaging in aggressive or harassing behavior. In the context of “fat women of walmart,” anonymous users may feel emboldened to make hurtful comments and share disparaging images, contributing to a toxic online environment. This anonymity makes it difficult to identify and hold perpetrators accountable for their actions.
-
Amplification through Social Media
Social media platforms serve as potent amplifiers for online harassment. Content, including images and commentary related to “fat women of walmart,” can quickly spread across networks, reaching a vast audience. This amplification effect intensifies the impact of the harassment, increasing the victim’s exposure to negative attention and potentially causing significant emotional distress. The virality of such content can be difficult to control, further compounding the problem.
-
Cyberbullying and Trolling
The phenomenon surrounding “fat women of walmart” aligns with the broader issue of cyberbullying and trolling. These forms of online harassment often involve targeted attacks on individuals based on their physical appearance or other personal characteristics. The goal is typically to provoke a reaction, inflict emotional harm, or gain amusement at the expense of the victim. The anonymity and distance afforded by the internet can make cyberbullying and trolling particularly insidious, as perpetrators may feel insulated from the consequences of their actions.
-
Lack of Legal Recourse
Despite the harm caused by online harassment, legal recourse can be limited. Laws regarding online speech vary across jurisdictions, and proving intent to harm or identifying perpetrators can be challenging. This lack of legal protection leaves many victims of online harassment feeling vulnerable and helpless. The difficulty in pursuing legal action can further embolden perpetrators and perpetuate the cycle of online abuse. Therefor, laws against this sort of cyberbullying needs to improve and evolve.
The convergence of anonymity, social media amplification, cyberbullying tactics, and limited legal recourse creates a challenging environment for individuals targeted by the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon. Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach, including promoting online empathy, enhancing platform moderation policies, and strengthening legal frameworks to protect individuals from online harassment and abuse.
3. Socioeconomic status indicator
The phrase “fat women of walmart” operates, in part, as a subtle but potent socioeconomic status indicator. It relies on a constellation of stereotypes linking obesity, specific retail environments, and perceived lower economic standing. The association is constructed by visually coupling overweight individuals with Walmart, a retail chain often patronized by budget-conscious shoppers. This association implicitly suggests a connection between physical appearance, shopping habits, and economic circumstances. The act of photographing individuals in this context, without their consent, and sharing it online further underscores the implicit class judgment. A real-life example involves the proliferation of these images alongside commentary deriding both the physical appearance of the women and the perceived lack of sophistication in choosing Walmart as a shopping destination. Understanding this element is crucial because it reveals how seemingly innocuous phrases can perpetuate and reinforce harmful socioeconomic biases.
Further analysis reveals that the practical significance of this understanding extends beyond simple observation. It highlights the intersectionality of prejudice, where judgments based on appearance are intertwined with assumptions about economic status. The targeting of women, in particular, also speaks to the gendered nature of these stereotypes. For instance, comments accompanying such images often exhibit a condescending tone, portraying the women as lacking in agency or awareness. This reinforces the notion that certain bodies and shopping behaviors are inherently linked to a lower social stratum. The perpetuation of these stereotypes can have tangible consequences, influencing hiring practices, social interactions, and even policy decisions related to welfare and public health.
In conclusion, the connection between socioeconomic status and the phrase “fat women of walmart” underscores the subtle ways in which class bias can manifest in online culture. By linking physical appearance and shopping habits to perceived economic standing, the phrase contributes to the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes. Recognizing this connection is vital for challenging these biases and promoting a more equitable and inclusive society. The challenge lies in deconstructing these deeply ingrained stereotypes and fostering empathy for individuals from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
4. Stereotype perpetuation
The phrase “fat women of walmart” functions as a potent vehicle for stereotype perpetuation, reinforcing pre-existing societal biases related to weight, gender, socioeconomic status, and consumer behavior. It amalgamates these biases into a single, easily disseminated meme, creating a readily accessible template for negative judgment. The act of repeatedly sharing and consuming this image and its associated commentary normalizes these stereotypes, embedding them further into collective consciousness. Cause and effect are readily apparent: the initial image, regardless of its context, serves as the cause, while the reinforcement of negative stereotypes regarding the aforementioned categories becomes the effect. The importance of stereotype perpetuation as a component of the phrase lies in its ability to sustain the term’s offensive power; without the underlying stereotypes, the phrase would lack its sting. Real-life examples manifest in the form of social media threads where the image is shared with captions that explicitly articulate these stereotypes, often deriding the women’s choices, appearance, and presumed life circumstances.
Further analysis reveals that the continued circulation of this meme contributes to a broader culture of body shaming and class discrimination. The practical significance of this understanding is that it allows for a more nuanced approach to combating online harassment. Rather than simply focusing on the offensiveness of the phrase itself, it necessitates addressing the root causes: the deeply ingrained stereotypes that make the phrase so hurtful. These stereotypes can then influence implicit biases, shaping attitudes and behaviors in ways that disadvantage individuals fitting the depicted profile. For example, research suggests that exposure to negative stereotypes can lead to discriminatory hiring practices, where individuals fitting the stereotype are perceived as less competent or less qualified. Similarly, it can contribute to a hostile social environment where these individuals are subject to microaggressions and exclusionary behavior.
In conclusion, “fat women of walmart” is a prime example of how a seemingly simple phrase can contribute significantly to stereotype perpetuation. By exploiting existing biases related to weight, gender, class, and consumer behavior, the phrase reinforces negative judgments and contributes to a culture of shaming and discrimination. Addressing this issue requires a multifaceted approach, including challenging harmful stereotypes through education and awareness campaigns, promoting body positivity, and holding individuals accountable for perpetuating discriminatory content online. The broader challenge lies in fostering a more empathetic and inclusive society where individuals are judged on their merits rather than on preconceived notions.
5. Public shaming
Public shaming, as a form of social control, involves exposing an individual’s perceived flaws or transgressions to a public audience, intending to elicit condemnation and ostracization. In the context of “fat women of walmart,” public shaming manifests through the unauthorized capture and dissemination of images and videos, often accompanied by disparaging commentary, targeting individuals based on their weight, appearance, and shopping location.
-
Image Dissemination Without Consent
The core of public shaming within this context lies in the surreptitious capture and dissemination of images without the subject’s consent. Individuals are photographed or filmed in a public space a Walmart store and their images are then shared online, often with the explicit purpose of ridicule. The lack of consent underscores the violation of privacy and autonomy inherent in this practice. For example, an image might circulate with captions focusing on the individual’s weight or clothing choices, turning a mundane act of shopping into an opportunity for widespread mockery. This process transforms private individuals into public spectacles against their will.
-
Amplification via Social Media
Social media platforms act as significant amplifiers in the public shaming process. What might begin as a single post on an imageboard or social network can quickly proliferate across various online communities, reaching a vast audience. Algorithms and sharing mechanisms contribute to the rapid spread of these images, intensifying the impact of the shaming. For instance, a tweet with a derogatory image might be retweeted thousands of times, exposing the targeted individual to a barrage of negative attention. This rapid amplification can exacerbate feelings of humiliation and vulnerability.
-
Dehumanization and Objectification
Public shaming often involves the dehumanization and objectification of the targeted individual. The focus shifts from the person to their physical attributes, reducing them to a caricature. In the “fat women of walmart” context, the individual is stripped of their identity and reduced to their weight and perceived socioeconomic status. This dehumanization makes it easier for perpetrators to engage in harassment and ridicule, as they fail to recognize the humanity of their target. The online commentary often reinforces this objectification, focusing on superficial aspects and ignoring the individual’s inherent worth.
-
Psychological Consequences
The psychological consequences of public shaming can be profound and long-lasting. Targeted individuals may experience feelings of shame, anxiety, depression, and social isolation. The fear of further exposure and ridicule can lead to a reluctance to engage in public activities, impacting their quality of life. In extreme cases, public shaming can contribute to suicidal ideation. The anonymity of the internet can exacerbate these effects, as victims may feel powerless to respond or defend themselves against the onslaught of negativity. Support groups and mental health professionals are often needed to help individuals cope with the trauma associated with public shaming.
The facets outlined above illustrate the detrimental connection between public shaming and the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon. The unauthorized capture and dissemination of images, amplified by social media, leads to dehumanization and profound psychological consequences for the targeted individuals. The practice represents a form of online harassment that erodes privacy, promotes negativity, and inflicts lasting damage on its victims. This issue emphasizes the need for increased awareness, empathy, and responsible online behavior.
6. Anonymity’s role
Anonymity plays a significant role in perpetuating the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon, providing a shield for individuals engaging in harassment and enabling the rapid spread of offensive content. The perceived lack of accountability fosters a toxic online environment where individuals feel emboldened to engage in behaviors they might otherwise avoid.
-
Reduced Accountability for Harassment
Anonymity reduces accountability for online behavior. Users can create accounts with pseudonyms or without verifiable personal information, making it difficult to trace their actions back to their real-world identities. This lack of accountability encourages the posting of disparaging comments and the sharing of unauthorized images without fear of personal repercussions. For example, users might create temporary accounts to post offensive content and then delete them to avoid detection. The resulting lack of consequences normalizes harassing behavior and emboldens others to participate.
-
Deindividuation and Empathy Reduction
Anonymity promotes deindividuation, a psychological state where individuals experience a diminished sense of personal identity and responsibility. This, in turn, reduces empathy towards the targeted individuals. Users may perceive their online interactions as detached from real-world consequences, leading them to view the subjects of their comments as abstract entities rather than individuals with feelings and dignity. This detachment facilitates the posting of cruel and dehumanizing content, contributing to the overall toxicity of the online environment.
-
Circumventing Platform Moderation
Anonymity facilitates the circumvention of platform moderation policies. While many social media platforms have rules against harassment and hate speech, anonymous users can create multiple accounts or use VPNs to evade detection and continue posting offensive content even after being banned. This constant evasion of moderation efforts makes it difficult for platforms to effectively combat online harassment, allowing the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon to persist despite efforts to suppress it. The result is a cat-and-mouse game where platform moderators are perpetually trying to catch up with anonymous users intent on spreading harmful content.
-
Amplifying the Spread of Harmful Content
Anonymity, coupled with the ease of sharing content online, amplifies the spread of harmful content. Users can anonymously share images and comments related to “fat women of walmart” across various platforms, reaching a vast audience. This rapid dissemination exacerbates the harm caused to the targeted individuals, exposing them to widespread ridicule and criticism. The anonymity of the sharers makes it difficult to trace the origin of the content and hold those responsible for its spread accountable. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of harassment and shame.
The facets presented highlight the integral role of anonymity in enabling and perpetuating the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon. The reduced accountability, diminished empathy, circumvention of moderation, and amplified spread of harmful content all contribute to a toxic online environment where individuals are subjected to harassment and public shaming. Addressing this issue necessitates a multi-faceted approach, including promoting online accountability, fostering empathy, and strengthening platform moderation policies to combat the abuse of anonymity.
7. Retail environment context
The retail environment, specifically Walmart in the phrase “fat women of walmart,” serves as a crucial backdrop that shapes the term’s meaning and impact. Walmart, as a large retail chain known for its affordability and accessibility to a broad socioeconomic demographic, is deliberately invoked to add a layer of class commentary to the body shaming. The phrase does not merely target weight; it implicitly criticizes the choice of shopping location, suggesting a correlation between physical appearance, economic status, and consumer behavior. The store, therefore, becomes a symbolic setting, reinforcing stereotypes and contributing to the overall demeaning effect. Cause and effect are intertwined: the choice of Walmart as the setting causes the phrase to carry an added layer of socioeconomic judgment, impacting perceptions of the targeted individuals.
The importance of the retail environment context as a component of “fat women of walmart” lies in its ability to amplify the stereotypes associated with both weight and socioeconomic status. Real-life examples include online discussions where commenters mock the women’s clothing choices, presuming they are limited by their economic circumstances. This highlights how the setting reinforces the negative connotations. Further analysis reveals that the practical significance of this understanding is its impact on perceptions and social dynamics. Walmart becomes a stage for this implicit judgment, influencing how these individuals are viewed and treated. For instance, studies have shown that perceptions of a persons economic status influence unconscious biases related to competence and reliability.
In conclusion, the retail environment context is inseparable from the overall meaning and impact of “fat women of walmart.” By associating the individuals with a particular shopping location, the phrase implicitly layers class judgment onto body shaming. Understanding this association is vital for deconstructing the harmful stereotypes perpetuated by the phrase and fostering a more equitable and empathetic society. The broader challenge lies in disentangling perceptions of worth from consumer choices and socioeconomic indicators.
8. Ethical considerations
Ethical considerations are central to understanding the profound implications of the phrase “fat women of walmart.” The creation, dissemination, and perpetuation of this term raise significant ethical questions regarding privacy, consent, respect, and the responsibility associated with online behavior. The core ethical violation stems from the unauthorized capture and sharing of images of individuals in a public space, transforming them into objects of ridicule without their knowledge or consent. The phrase’s inherent dehumanization exacerbates this violation, turning individuals into targets of online harassment based on their physical appearance and presumed socioeconomic status. Cause and effect are directly linked: the unethical act of capturing and sharing these images causes harm to the individuals depicted and contributes to a broader culture of online shaming.
The importance of ethical considerations as a component of “fat women of walmart” lies in the term’s capacity to reveal broader societal failures in empathy and respect. Real-life examples abound, manifesting as comment threads filled with derogatory remarks about the women’s bodies and shopping choices. The practical significance of this understanding resides in its ability to inform responsible online behavior and encourage critical engagement with media content. Further analysis reveals that ethical frameworks, such as utilitarianism and deontology, provide lenses through which to evaluate the moral permissibility of such actions. Utilitarianism might argue that the widespread dissemination of these images causes more harm than good, while deontology would emphasize the inherent wrongness of violating an individual’s privacy and dignity, regardless of the consequences. The challenge, therefore, lies in promoting a culture of ethical awareness online, encouraging individuals to consider the potential harm their actions may inflict.
In conclusion, the ethical considerations surrounding “fat women of walmart” highlight the urgent need for greater empathy, respect, and accountability in online interactions. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach, including promoting media literacy, fostering ethical decision-making, and holding perpetrators of online harassment accountable for their actions. The challenge remains in fostering a society where ethical principles guide online behavior, ensuring that the internet becomes a space for connection and empowerment rather than ridicule and harm.
9. Dehumanization’s impact
Dehumanization, the process of regarding individuals as less than human, is central to the harm perpetuated by the phrase “fat women of walmart.” This dehumanization enables the objectification and ridicule of the targeted individuals, stripping them of their inherent dignity and worth. The phrase itself serves as a tool for dehumanization, reducing the women to their physical appearance and perceived socioeconomic status. This reduction facilitates the online harassment and shaming that often accompany the phrase’s use. The cause lies in the deliberate use of language and imagery that diminishes the women’s humanity, with the effect being a climate of online abuse and social ostracization. The importance of dehumanization’s impact as a component of “fat women of walmart” lies in understanding how it neutralizes empathy and justifies harmful behavior. Real-life examples include online comment sections filled with derogatory remarks that disregard the individuals’ feelings or experiences. This understanding is significant because it clarifies the mechanisms through which the phrase inflicts its damage.
Further analysis reveals that dehumanization is not merely an abstract concept; it has tangible consequences for the targeted individuals. The psychological impact of being publicly reduced to a caricature can be devastating, leading to feelings of shame, anxiety, and depression. The constant barrage of negative attention can erode self-esteem and lead to social isolation. Moreover, dehumanization can extend beyond the individuals directly targeted by the phrase, creating a broader culture of intolerance and discrimination. For example, studies have shown that exposure to dehumanizing language can lead to increased prejudice and a willingness to support discriminatory policies. In practical terms, recognizing the role of dehumanization in the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon necessitates challenging the language and imagery that contribute to it. This includes promoting empathy, fostering understanding, and holding individuals accountable for perpetuating dehumanizing content online. Legal and social recourse for victims are often limited, further exacerbating the impact.
In conclusion, the phrase “fat women of walmart” derives much of its power from dehumanization. By reducing individuals to their physical attributes and shopping habits, it strips them of their humanity and justifies online harassment. Recognizing the impact of dehumanization is vital for combating this form of online abuse. The challenge involves fostering a culture of empathy and respect, both online and offline, and actively challenging the language and imagery that contribute to dehumanization. A society that values human dignity is less likely to tolerate the kind of abuse exemplified by the “fat women of walmart” phenomenon. The battle against dehumanization requires continuous vigilance and a commitment to promoting the inherent worth of all individuals.
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding “Fat Women of Walmart”
This section addresses common questions and misconceptions surrounding the phrase “fat women of walmart,” providing factual information and ethical considerations.
Question 1: What is the origin of the phrase “fat women of walmart”?
The phrase originated online, associated with images and videos purportedly depicting overweight women in Walmart stores. It gained traction through imageboards and social media, often used in a derogatory manner.
Question 2: Is the phrase considered offensive?
Yes, the phrase is widely considered offensive. It targets individuals based on their weight, gender, and presumed socioeconomic status, contributing to body shaming and class discrimination.
Question 3: What ethical concerns are raised by the use of this phrase?
The use of this phrase raises ethical concerns related to privacy, consent, and respect. Unauthorized capture and dissemination of images, combined with derogatory commentary, violate individuals’ dignity and promote online harassment.
Question 4: Does the phrase perpetuate stereotypes?
The phrase actively perpetuates stereotypes, reinforcing pre-existing biases related to weight, gender, economic status, and consumer behavior. It contributes to a culture of shaming and intolerance.
Question 5: How does anonymity contribute to the problem?
Anonymity online reduces accountability and fosters deindividuation, enabling users to engage in harassing behavior without fear of personal repercussions. This emboldens individuals to post offensive content and evade platform moderation.
Question 6: What can be done to combat the negative impact of this phrase?
Combating the negative impact requires a multi-faceted approach, including promoting media literacy, fostering empathy and respect online, strengthening platform moderation policies, and holding perpetrators of online harassment accountable.
Understanding the origins, ethical implications, and societal impact of this phrase is crucial for promoting responsible online behavior and challenging harmful stereotypes.
This information sets the stage for exploring potential solutions and strategies for fostering a more inclusive and respectful online environment.
Navigating Online Harassment
This section offers practical strategies for individuals who find themselves targeted by online harassment campaigns similar to that associated with the phrase “fat women of walmart.” These tips emphasize self-care, online safety, and available resources.
Tip 1: Document and Preserve Evidence of Harassment. Screenshot offensive posts, comments, and messages. Record the dates, times, and platforms where the harassment occurred. This documentation can be crucial for reporting the abuse to platform administrators or law enforcement.
Tip 2: Utilize Platform Reporting Mechanisms. Familiarize oneself with the reporting tools available on social media platforms and online forums. Report abusive content and accounts that violate the platform’s terms of service. While not always immediate, reporting contributes to platform accountability.
Tip 3: Adjust Privacy Settings. Review and adjust privacy settings on all social media accounts. Limit the visibility of personal information to trusted contacts only. Consider making accounts private or deactivating them temporarily to reduce exposure to harassment.
Tip 4: Seek Support from Trusted Individuals. Reach out to friends, family, or support groups for emotional support. Sharing experiences with others who understand can alleviate feelings of isolation and shame. Consider seeking professional counseling if the harassment is causing significant distress.
Tip 5: Practice Self-Care. Engage in activities that promote well-being and reduce stress. This might include spending time in nature, exercising, practicing mindfulness, or pursuing hobbies. Prioritizing self-care is essential for maintaining mental and emotional health during a period of online harassment.
Tip 6: Be Aware of Legal Options. Familiarize oneself with the laws related to online harassment and cyberbullying in the relevant jurisdiction. Consult with a legal professional to explore potential legal options, such as restraining orders or defamation lawsuits.
Implementing these tips can provide individuals with a proactive framework for responding to and mitigating the impact of online harassment. By focusing on documentation, platform utilization, privacy, support, self-care, and legal awareness, targeted individuals can regain a sense of control and protect their well-being.
These strategies offer a proactive approach to managing the immediate impact of online harassment. The article’s conclusion will provide a broader perspective on combating the underlying causes of such behavior.
Conclusion
This article has explored the multifaceted nature of “fat women of walmart,” dissecting its component parts to reveal the underlying issues of body image scrutiny, online harassment, socioeconomic stereotyping, stereotype perpetuation, public shaming, the enabling role of anonymity, the significance of the retail environment context, ethical violations, and the devastating impact of dehumanization. The analysis has demonstrated how a seemingly simple phrase can encapsulate and amplify deeply ingrained societal biases, contributing to a culture of online abuse and discrimination.
The persistence of such phenomena demands a collective commitment to challenging harmful stereotypes, fostering empathy, and promoting responsible online behavior. Dismantling the structures that enable dehumanization and public shaming requires ongoing vigilance and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths about societal prejudices. Only through sustained effort can a more inclusive and equitable online environment be cultivated, one where individuals are judged on their merits rather than subjected to the corrosive effects of prejudice and ridicule. “Fat women of walmart” serves as a stark reminder of the work that remains to be done.
